This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Special Reports


2026-03-13

MCLE

What law firm associates should know about their ethical obligations

Mar. 11, 2026

Junior lawyers must mind ethics, supervise staff, avoid c...

By Alanna G. Clair, Shari L. Klevens

Facts, not findings: What practitioners get wrong about stipulations under Family Code § 3044

Mar. 6, 2026

Stipulations can streamline custody cases, even in domest...

By Jackson Lucky

Heppner case shows client AI interactions can break attorney client privilege

Mar. 6, 2026

The February 2026 Heppner decision marks the firs...

By William Slomanson


Special Coverage

The Daily Journal livestreamed from the 2026 California International Arbitration Week. Catch up on all of the videos here.



Today's News

Intellectual Property


Epidemic Sound, a Swedish music production and licensing company, sued Meta in 2022 alleging the tech giant copied and distributed its music without a licens...


U.S. Magistrate Judge Steve Kim ordered an in-person deposition and warned of "zero tolerance" for delays while partially granting Patagonia's sanctions moti...


A federal judge granted Amazon a preliminary injunction blocking Perplexity's Comet AI agents from accessing Amazon systems and ordered the startup to destro...


Elon Musk told a federal jury his tweet pausing the $44 billion Twitter deal was literal and not meant to move markets, as investors claim it was part of a s...


A federal judge signaled approval of Grubhub's $24.75 million settlement with California delivery drivers in a long-running misclassification lawsuit, pendin...


Ethics/Professional Responsibility


A strike by Solano County public defenders refusing new cases may soon halt criminal hearings, as critics warn too few private attorneys exist to represent i...


Columns

Ethics/Professional Responsibility

California civility rule meets its match in First Amendment

Mar. 13, 2026
By Erin M. Joyce, Ben Gharagozli

California Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4.1 was designed to prevent attorney discrimination and harassment, but First Amendm...


Labor/Employment

Knowledge is power: An employer's guide to California's Know Your Rights Act

Mar. 13, 2026
By Matthew T. Drenan, Pouch C. Liang

California's Workplace Know Your Rights Act consolidates existing workplace notice requirements and adds new obligations, cont...


Insurance, Consumer Protection Law

The Make It FAIR Act: A sustainable solution or compounding problems?

Mar. 13, 2026
By Adam M. Weg, Caitlin Oswald

Assembly Bill 1680 proposes expanding the California FAIR Plan to offer more comprehensive homeowners coverage, but the econom...



Verdicts & Settlements

Whistleblower Retaliation Joseph Williams, Jesus Lope... $52,460,862
Auto v. Auto Tracey Fleming v. David Soi... $30,560,000
Consumers Legal Remedies Act Susan Costa, an individual,... $6,500,000
Invasion of Privacy Nathan Colombo, individuall... $6,022,500
Wage and Hour Jared Deaver, as an individ... $5,093,537
Wage and Hour Paola Uribe, individually, ... $2,195,000
Unfair Competition The People of the State of ... $2,102,000
Age Discrimination U.S. Equal Employment Oppor... $2,000,000
Breach of Fiduciary Duty Bloomage Beverly Hills Inve... $1,999,376
Wage and Hour Mark Cohen, Mitchell McKinn... $1,600,000

On the Move

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Mar. 13, 2026


Gina Marek joined Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP as a partner in Silicon Valley. The move was March 11, 2026.

Marek brings decades of experience structuring complex deals for high-growth companies across life sciences, fintech, healthcare, and enterprise software. She focuses on corporate partnering, technology licensing, strategic alliances, and IP-driven M&A -- counseling venture capital investors and public companies on IP, privacy, and data protection. At Orrick, she collaborates with the firm's venture capital, M&A, and emerging company teams. She previously co-chaired the Strategic Transactions and Licensing Group at her prior firm.


Details

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP has 1000 attorneys in 25 offices including Sacramento; San Francisco; Silicon Valley; Los Angeles; Santa Monica; Orange County. Among the law firm’s key practice areas are Energy & Infrastructure; Life Sciences & HealthTech; Finance; Tech & Innovation; Supreme Court & Appellate. The firm’s website is www.orrick.com

Featured Content


Community News

Los Angeles Superior Court Presiding Judge Sergio C. Tapia II and Supervising Civil Judge Lawrence P. Riff addressed the gathering, discussing the court's growing civil caseload and changes underway to manage it.



Podcasts

Melanie Chaney, firm-wide managing partner of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, on how mid-size firms can innovate without the budget ...


Daily Appellate Report

Evidence

Yan v. City of Diamond Bar

Admitting evidence of prior similar incidents of tree branches falling from same species of tree in same neighborhood solely to prove the City's notice of dangerous condition was not error.


Habeas Corpus

Combs v. Broomfield

Federal habeas relief denial was affirmed where record showed counsel's performance was not deficient and petitioner failed to show prejudice from the alleged failure to prepare expert wi...


Constitutional Law

NetChoice LLC v. Bonta

District court erred in preliminarily enjoining California's Age-Appropriate Design Code Act's coverage provision based on tech companies' facial First Amendment challenge because plainti...


Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Valencia

Trial court committed sentencing errors in calculating defendant's consecutive determinate sentences by failing to apply Penal Code section 1170.1's one-third middle-term rule.