This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Special Reports


Firm Profile

How Sacks Glazier is shaping California trust and estate law

Sacks, Glazier, Franklin, Lodise, McMurtrey & Scheerer LLP

2026-06-13

MCLE

California State Bar's proposed AI ethics rules put attorneys on notice

Jun. 12, 2026

COPRAC's proposed rule changes would require California a...

By Daniel Butler

New guidance, proposed rule changes on generative AI in legal practice

Jun. 4, 2026

The State Bar of California's updated guidance and propos...

By Susie Dent

How meditation and Stoicism help lawyers manage stress and improve legal practice

May 29, 2026

Meditation and Stoicism can help attorneys manage stress,...

By Ben Kassis


Special Coverage

Government


Lawmakers reach a budget deal with $375M for Prop 36

Jun. 12, 2026
By Malcolm Maclachlan

California lawmakers reached a budget deal that includes $375 million to implement Proposition 36, plus funding for legal aid,...



Today's News

Torts/Personal Injury


Jury awards $10M in fatal deputy shooting case

Jun. 15, 2026
By Skyler Romero

Jurors found a Los Angeles County sheriff's deputy acted with a "purpose to harm" when he fatally shot a motorist during a 2021 traffic stop.


Torts/Personal Injury


Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman asked a judge to pause payments from the county's $4 billion child sexual abuse settlement, alleging that...


Criminal


Fourteen amicus briefs were filed in support of San Francisco Public Defender Manohar P. Raju's challenge to a contempt order arising from his refusal to acc...


Class Action


Meta class bid turns on value of health data

Jun. 15, 2026
By Daniel Schrager

A federal judge's questions about how to value health information could determine whether users alleging Meta improperly collected medical data may proceed a...


Torts/Personal Injury


Lawyers say the nearly $200 million verdict against Rebecca Grossman and Scott Erickson reflects unusually egregious facts, a rare punitive damages award and...


Fresh off an unopposed reelection, San Bernardino District Attorney Jason Anderson discusses judicial shortages, AI-assisted evidence review, recruitment cha...


Columns

Construction

A new path for construction defects in California

Jun. 15, 2026
By Brenda K. Radmacher

Repair first, litigate later: How AB 1903 could reshape California's condominium construction defect.


Constitutional Law

Reed v. Town of Gilbert: Sign regulation 10 years later

Jun. 15, 2026
By Marco A. Martinez

Two landmark Supreme Court decisions have reshaped how cities regulate signs, giving local governments a roadmap for crafting ...


9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

The naughty 9th

Jun. 12, 2026
By Richard W. Morris

The 9th Circuit upheld Arizona's bar admission restrictions and sanctions despite a recent 8-1 U.S. Supreme Court decision rej...



Verdicts & Settlements

Wage and Hour Chanielle Enomoto v. Siemen... $5,500,000
Auto v. Truck Doe v. Roe Delivery Company $4,500,000
Conversion Ginger Drinkwater v. Stewar... $3,603,024
Wage and Hour Amit Singh, individually, a... $3,350,000
Malpractice Jane Doe v. Roe Medical Group $2,600,000
Premises Liability Sharon Richardson, Charles ... $2,470,000
Wage and Hour Kadie Freeman, Francisco Ga... $2,400,000
Malpractice Elizabeth Amaya Garcia v. R... $2,363,766
Wage and Hour Melanie J. Hall, individual... $2,060,000
Wage and Hour Femi Jordan, individually a... $1,985,000

On the Move

ADR Services, Inc.

Jun. 11, 2026


David Alan Patton joined ADR Services, Inc. as a neutral in San Jose. The move was Jun. 16, 2026.

Patton, a Certified Family Law Specialist with more than 30 years of experience, handles complex family law disputes involving high-net-worth individuals, business owners, executives, and custody and support matters. He co-founded the firm now known as Lonich, Patton, Ehrlich & Policastri and led its family law division. He has also served as a mediator, settlement officer, judge pro tem and arbitrator for the Santa Clara County Superior Court. Patton is a former commissioner and vice chair of the State Bar of California's Family Law Advisory Committee. His recognitions include an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell and selection to Super Lawyers each year since 2012.


Details

ADR Services, Inc. has 150 neutrals in 7 offices including Century City, Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose. Among the company's key practice areas are Family Law, Personal Injury, Employment, Business, Insurance. The firm’s website is www.adrservices.com

Address

96 North 3rd Street, Suite 350 , San Jose California 95112 USA
T: (408) 280-7111

Featured Content


Community News

Slideshow, Community News


Assistant Presiding Judge Ricardo Ocampo delivered remarks on the challenges facing the South Asian community as judges, attor...




Daily Appellate Report

Fees and Costs, Municipal Law

County of Del Norte v. Britt

Prevailing parties in housing receivership proceedings may recover attorney fees from county despite statute generally shielding municipalities from costs.


Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Bustillos

Sentencing protections enacted by Senate Bill 567 applied when defendant was resentenced in 2024, even though his case remained nonfinal only because he had absconded from supervision.


Attorneys

Quinteros v. Harbor Distributing

Trial court properly sanctioned attorneys who submitted brief containing misstatements of the law, nonexistent citations, and fabricated quotations.


Arbitration

Doss v. Tesla

Because Tesla yard hostlers performed work essential to completing the interstate transportation process, they qualified for the Federal Arbitration Act's transportation-worker exemption.


Criminal Law and Procedure

People v. Scott

Despite concluding petitioner was eligible for resentencing relief under Proposition 47, trial court should conduct new public-safety-risk determination under Proposition 36 to determine ...