This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Business Law

Sep. 21, 2026

Jury gets Nektar's $1B drug-development fight with Eli Lilly

Nektar told jurors Eli Lilly deliberately stalled development of autoimmune drug Rezpeg to protect a competing drug it owned outright, while Lilly said Rezpeg's side effects and disappointing results drove legitimate development decisions.

A federal jury began deliberating Thursday over whether Eli Lilly & Co. deliberately sidelined a promising autoimmune drug to protect a competing treatment it owned outright, or simply made reasonable business decisions about a drug whose prospects had dimmed.

Before sending the case to jurors, U.S. District Judge James Donato offered Nektar Therapeutics' attorneys one last rejection.

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP partner Christopher Tayback had asked ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up