Technology
Jul. 20, 2026
Lawyers embrace litigation analytics but still rely on human judgment
California lawyers say litigation analytics and artificial intelligence improve efficiency and litigation strategy but cannot replace attorney judgment, courtroom experience or the human decision-making of judges and juries.
As litigation analytics and artificial intelligence become increasingly embedded in legal practice, some California attorneys say that while the technology improves efficiency and helps inform decisions, it does not replace the experience and judgment needed to advise clients and navigate cases.
That sentiment is reflected in results from Lex Machina's "2026 Impact of Legal Analytics Survey," which the legal analytics platform released last month.
The nation...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In