This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Technology

Jul. 20, 2026

Lawyers embrace litigation analytics but still rely on human judgment

California lawyers say litigation analytics and artificial intelligence improve efficiency and litigation strategy but cannot replace attorney judgment, courtroom experience or the human decision-making of judges and juries.

Lawyers embrace litigation analytics but still rely on human judgment
Dmitry Gorin of Eisner Gorin LLP

As litigation analytics and artificial intelligence become increasingly embedded in legal practice, some California attorneys say that while the technology improves efficiency and helps inform decisions, it does not replace the experience and judgment needed to advise clients and navigate cases.

That sentiment is reflected in results from Lex Machina's "2026 Impact of Legal Analytics Survey," which the legal analytics platform released last month.

The nation...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up