Civil Litigation
Sep. 15, 2021
Bootmakers challenge state law against import of caiman skins
The complaint filed Monday by Christopher D. Hughes with Nossaman LLP in Sacramento and David E. Frulla with Kelley Drye & Warren LLP in Washington, D.C., argues AB 1260 is federally preempted.
Their boots are made of caimans, and they want to keep it that way, say the plaintiffs in a lawsuit that challenges a 2019 state law aimed at barring the import and sale of certain animal skins in California starting Jan. 1.
The complaint filed Monday by Christopher D. Hughes with Nossaman LLP in Sacramento and David E. Frulla with Kelley Drye & Warren LLP in Washington, D.C., argues AB 1260 is federally preempted.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
