Labor/Employment,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Nov. 2, 2020
Tweak in ruling on worker searches may have big impact for Apple
The decision, filed last week, is a small tweak in a Sept. 2 ruling that had been a victory for workers, reversing a summary judgment ruling by U.S. District Judge William Alsup of San Francisco in favor of Apple.
Apple Inc. will get another chance to prove the seconds employees spend waiting to get their bags searched to combat theft is not enough to matter after a 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel amended its ruling.
The decision, filed last week, is a small tweak in a Sept. 2 ruling that had been a victory for workers, reversing a summary judgment ruling by U.S. District Judge
Or access this article for $45
Already a subscriber?
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Labor Law
Amended Opinion: Frlekin v. Apple
Employees' time spent on employer's premises waiting for and undergoing required exit searches of packages, bags, or personal technology devices voluntarily brought to work for personal c...
Labor Law
Frlekin v. Apple
Employees' time spent on employer's premises waiting for and undergoing required exit searches of packages, bags, or personal technology devices voluntarily brought to work for personal c...
Employment Law
Frlekin v. Apple Inc.
An employer's level of control over employees, not the mandatory nature of employees' activity, determines whether 'hours worked' are compensable under Wage Order 7.
