Technology,
Government
Oct. 9, 2020
Berkeley ends effort to require warnings for cellphones
Attorneys for the city agreed not to appeal a federal judge's ruling issued last month finding that Berkeley was interfering with federal oversight by enforcing the measure in exchange for plaintiff Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association agreeing not to pursue attorneys fees, according to a court filing.
Berkeley won't require cellphone retailers to warn customers about possible radiation dangers of holding phones too close to their bodies, ending a five-year legal battle over the first-of-its-kind ordinance.
Attorneys for the city agreed not to appeal a federal judge's ruling issued last month finding that Berkeley was interfering with federal oversight by enforcing the measure in exchange for plaintiff Cellular Telecommunications ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Constitutional Law
CTIA v. City of Berkeley
Challenged Berkeley ordinance was reasonably related to substantial governmental interest in public health and safety and its text was literally true, so it survived plaintiff's First Ame...
Constitutional Law
CTIA v. City of Berkeley
City ordinance requiring cellphone providers to post FCC safety guidelines in stores not violative of First Amendment, as City has interest in limiting commercial speech to promote public...
