Consumer Law,
Civil Litigation
Jul. 16, 2020
Coffee industry sees wins in fight over labeling
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Elihu M. Berle denied the first three motions by the plaintiff, ruling the coffee defendants pointed out triable issues of fact.
LOS ANGELES -- Coffee industry defendants scored a win Wednesday in a 10-year litigation over labeling after a superior court judge denied a series of critical plaintiff's motions seeking to invalidate a new state regulation that said coffee isn't dangerous.
The regulation is being used as an affirmative defense by coffee companies hoping to avoid the requirement to put warnings of possible toxicity on every container or cup of coff...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Health Care & Hospital Law, Government
Coffee labeling case appears headed for another trial
By Justin Kloczko
Health Care & Hospital Law, Government, Civil Litigation
Parties square off in federal litigation over coffee labeling
By Malcolm Maclachlan
Judges and Judiciary, California Supreme Court
State Supreme Court orders LA presiding judge to say why civil cases can’t proceed telephonically
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation
Attorneys work, and worry over what will happen to their cases
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation, Government
Judge denies administrative record motion in Starbucks case
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation, Government
Warning label requirements for chemical in coffee said to be unconstitutional
By Justin Kloczko