Civil Litigation
Dec. 16, 2019
Anti-SLAPP debate takes over Disneyland social club civil dispute
Defendants in a lawsuit between feuding Disney enthusiasts have been ordered to pay attorney fees for two failed motions
A civil dispute between Disneyland Inc., fan clubs has given rise to a fresh debate over California's heavily litigated and judicially vexing public participation law with a judge awarding attorney fees that cover appellate but not trial court costs associated with two failed motions.
Under orders finalized Wednesday, 22 Disneyland enthusiasts are to pay a couple who runs a rival club nearly $65,000 for two anti-SLAPP appeals that u...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Attorneys
Moore v. Kaufman
Attorney fee award against plaintiff's counsel based on anti-SLAPP motion is void, and counsel may defend herself on that ground in contempt proceeding.