Partner
Appellate and Constitutional Law and Intellectual Property
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
3161 Michelson Drive
Irvine , California 92612-4412
Irvine , California 92612-4412
Phone:
(949) 451-3805
Email:
bevanson@gibsondunn.com
Columbia Univ Law School
Columns
| Title | Category | Published | 
|---|---|---|
| The two-prong test to distinguish official versus private speech in the social media context | Constitutional Law | Mar. 26, 2024 | 
| Arguments shed light on justices’ thinking in Seila v. CFPB | U.S. Supreme Court, Government, Constitutional Law | Mar. 16, 2020 | 
| The First Monday | Oct. 7, 2019 | |
| SCOTUS Second Half | U.S. Supreme Court, Judges and Judiciary, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals | Feb. 8, 2019 | 
| En banc 9th Circuit should reconsider FTC Act case | Civil Litigation, Administrative/Regulatory, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals | Dec. 17, 2018 | 
| Is 8 Enough? A True 'Roberts Court' Begins | U.S. Supreme Court | Oct. 1, 2018 | 
| Kavanaugh Hearings Day 1: Doc Review | U.S. Supreme Court, Judges and Judiciary | Sep. 4, 2018 | 
| Kennedy, Kavanaugh and the OT17 term | U.S. Supreme Court, Judges and Judiciary | Jul. 12, 2018 | 
| First Amendment pressure points? | U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law | Oct. 20, 2017 | 
| The First Monday | U.S. Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Appellate Practice | Oct. 2, 2017 | 
| SCOTUS slaps down CASC on Specific PJx; Qualified Immunity up for Review? | U.S. Supreme Court, California Supreme Court, Appellate Practice | Jun. 23, 2017 | 
| Giving offense is a viewpoint | U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law | Jun. 23, 2017 | 
| Neil Gorsuch and executive power | Administrative/Regulatory | Feb. 22, 2017 | 
| Offensive trademark arguments at high court | Perspective | Jan. 19, 2017 | 
| High court to hear enhanced patent damages arguments | U.S. Supreme Court | Feb. 18, 2016 | 
| States must reassess regulatory boards | U.S. Supreme Court | Mar. 5, 2015 | 
| Judicial campaign rules go to court | U.S. Supreme Court, Judges and Judiciary | Dec. 24, 2014 | 
Verdicts & Settlements
| Case Name | Topic | Role | Published | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle America, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Oracle International Corporation, a California corporation v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, a Delaware corporation; and Does 1-50 | Intellectual Property | Defendant | Nov. 11, 2022 | 
| Christopher James, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Uber Technologies Inc. | Employment Law | Defendant | Sep. 16, 2022 | 
| Oracle America Inc. et al. v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. et al. | Intellectual Property | Defendant | Mar. 15, 2019 | 
| Title | Category | Published | 
|---|---|---|
| The two-prong test to distinguish official versus private speech in the social media context | Constitutional Law | Mar. 26, 2024 | 
| Arguments shed light on justices’ thinking in Seila v. CFPB | U.S. Supreme Court, Government, Constitutional Law | Mar. 16, 2020 | 
| The First Monday | Oct. 7, 2019 | |
| SCOTUS Second Half | U.S. Supreme Court, Judges and Judiciary, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals | Feb. 8, 2019 | 
| En banc 9th Circuit should reconsider FTC Act case | Civil Litigation, Administrative/Regulatory, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals | Dec. 17, 2018 | 
| Is 8 Enough? A True 'Roberts Court' Begins | U.S. Supreme Court | Oct. 1, 2018 | 
| Kavanaugh Hearings Day 1: Doc Review | U.S. Supreme Court, Judges and Judiciary | Sep. 4, 2018 | 
| Kennedy, Kavanaugh and the OT17 term | U.S. Supreme Court, Judges and Judiciary | Jul. 12, 2018 | 
| First Amendment pressure points? | U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law | Oct. 20, 2017 | 
| The First Monday | U.S. Supreme Court, Civil Litigation, Appellate Practice | Oct. 2, 2017 | 
| SCOTUS slaps down CASC on Specific PJx; Qualified Immunity up for Review? | U.S. Supreme Court, California Supreme Court, Appellate Practice | Jun. 23, 2017 | 
| Giving offense is a viewpoint | U.S. Supreme Court, Constitutional Law | Jun. 23, 2017 | 
| Neil Gorsuch and executive power | Administrative/Regulatory | Feb. 22, 2017 | 
| Offensive trademark arguments at high court | Perspective | Jan. 19, 2017 | 
| High court to hear enhanced patent damages arguments | U.S. Supreme Court | Feb. 18, 2016 | 
| States must reassess regulatory boards | U.S. Supreme Court | Mar. 5, 2015 | 
| Judicial campaign rules go to court | U.S. Supreme Court, Judges and Judiciary | Dec. 24, 2014 | 
| Case Name | Topic | Role | Published | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Oracle America, Inc., a Delaware corporation; Oracle International Corporation, a California corporation v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, a Delaware corporation; and Does 1-50 | Intellectual Property | Defendant | Nov. 11, 2022 | 
| Christopher James, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Uber Technologies Inc. | Employment Law | Defendant | Sep. 16, 2022 | 
| Oracle America Inc. et al. v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. et al. | Intellectual Property | Defendant | Mar. 15, 2019 | 
