This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

self-study / Law Practice Management

May 28, 2026

What AI and CRM actually mean for lawyers

George Brandon

President

Email: george@legalxcellence.com

George Brandon is president of LegalXcellence.com. He is a seasoned management, business development, marketing and IT professional with over 30 years of experience in the legal services industry, as well as an experienced business development attorney coach and marketing director with a proven track record of helping lawyers achieve their business development goals.

See more...


As law firms accelerate their adoption of AI, much of the conversation has focused on operations, systems and infrastructure. Yet the immediate question for lawyers is simpler and more personal:
Will this help me win work, serve clients better and protect my time, or is it just another system to deal with?
This is a valid and pertinent question, if experience is a guide.

The real issue is not new technology. It is old friction.

Lawyers have seen this cycle before.
A new CRM promises better relationships. A marketing platform promises greater visibility. A business development tool promises pipeline growth.
The rollout is optimistic. The reality is more complicated.
• Contact information becomes outdated
• Notes and interactions go unrecorded
• Systems rely on manual input that never quite happens
• Preparing for a meeting still means digging through emails and asking around

As a result, lawyers default to what works: memory, inboxes and trusted colleagues.
Lawyers resisting technology is not the main issue. The problem is that most systems in the past required effort without delivering immediate, tangible value.

A more useful question for lawyers

Most AI conversations focus on what technology might replace.
For lawyers, the better question is:
What friction can AI remove from the way I build relationships and generate work?

Such friction shows up every day:
• Not knowing the full history of a client relationship before a call
• Missing cross-selling opportunities across the firm
• Spending non-billable time preparing pitches and materials
• Relying on incomplete or outdated contact data
• Rebuilding the same lists, bios or credentials repeatedly

If AI is going to matter to lawyers, it won't be because it's impressive--it will be because AI quietly removes these obstacles.

What "helpful" actually looks like for lawyers

For lawyers, usefulness is practical and immediate. A system works if it supports your existing methods without adding complexity.

1. It surfaces relationship intelligence automatically

You should not have to search for information before a meeting. Relevant client activity, connections and history should be visible instantly.

2. It captures activity without requiring effort

If capture depends on manual entry, the effort won't happen. AI should build relationship data passively from emails, meetings and interactions.

3. It helps you act, not just store information

CRM should not feel like a database. It should help you decide:
• Who to follow up with
• When to reach out
• Where opportunities may exist

4. It accelerates business development tasks

Pitch materials, credentials and outreach should not start from scratch. AI could help generate, refine and tailor them quickly.

5. It reduces non-billable overhead

Time spent on administrative or preparatory work is time not spent practicing law. The right tools compress effort.
In short, the value is simple: less effort, better visibility, faster action.

From reactive to proactive lawyering

Much of business development today is reactive:
• Responding to incoming work
• Preparing when an opportunity has already been defined
• Reconnecting only when prompted

When friction is removed, something shifts.
Lawyers can become more proactive:
• Spotting opportunities earlier
• Making timely, relevant introductions
• Strengthening relationships before they go dormant
• Acting on insights instead of assumptions

This is not about turning lawyers into marketers. It's about giving them the information and timing to act more effectively.

The productivity reality

There is a lot of noise about AI replacing jobs.
For lawyers, the immediate impact is different:
It amplifies effectiveness.

The lawyers who understand their clients, their industries, and their firm's capabilities gain leverage when technology supports them properly and leads to:
• Faster, more informed client interactions
• Better-prepared pitches
• Increased responsiveness
• More consistent follow-through

The result is not doing more work--it is winning more of the right work with less friction.

Choosing what actually matters

Skepticism is reasonable. Lawyers have experienced enough underwhelming systems to justify doubt.
So, the evaluation standard should be straightforward:
• Does this save me time or create more work?
• Does AI give me useful insights or just more data?
• Does it fit how I already work or force me to change my behavior?

If the answers are not clear, the value will not be either.

A practical perspective

The shift happening is not just about new technology. It is about finally addressing a long-standing problem:
Business development has relied too much on memory, manual effort and incomplete information.

AI has the potential to change that.
Not by replacing lawyers, but by removing the surrounding friction.

For lawyers focused on building relationships, growing practices and protecting their time, this may be the most meaningful change of all.

Conclusion:

In the end, AI in CRM will not be judged by how advanced it sounds, but by how little lawyers must think about it. The real measure of success is whether AI fades into the background while making client development feel more natural, timely and effective. Firms that benefit most won't be the ones chasing features, but those choosing tools to reduce friction and support how their lawyers work. The advantage will not be more technology. It will lie in the possession of systems to help lawyers do what they have always done best: build trust, spot opportunities and turn relationships into lasting work.

#1876

Submit your own column for publication to Diana Bosetti


Related Tests for Law practice management

self-study/Law Practice Management

From busy to billable: Time management strategies for business-generating lawyers

By George Brandon

self-study/Law Practice Management

If it's not in writing, did it happen?

By Alanna G. Clair, Shari L. Klevens

self-study/Law Practice Management

Quantum meruit: As much as one has deserved

By David M. Majchrzak

self-study/Law Practice Management

Understanding client engagements and compensation structures

By Christine C. Rosskopf

self-study/Law Practice Management

Recent NLRB decisions affecting non-union employers

By Aya Z. Elalami, Arthur F. Silbergeld

self-study/Law Practice Management

Count 1: Practicing law without a license

By Stephen Allen Jamieson, Ralph B. Saltsman, Stephen Warren Solomon