For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com for prices or call 213-229-5424.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
Daily appellate reports
Enewsletter Sign-up
    Filter by date
     to 
    Search by Case Name
    Search by Judge
    Search by Case Number
    Search by DJ Citation Number
    Search by Category
    Search by Court

Name Category Published
Rall v. Tribune 365, LLC
Police investigation report published in newspaper privileged and protected against defamation suit since report was a fair and true report of a public issue. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/8 Dec. 20, 2019
Modification: O&C Creditors Group, LLC v. Stephens & Stephens XII, LLC
California's Anti-SLAPP statute protects the dispersal of settlement funds pursuant to active litigation; a lienhold challenger must demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits to overcome an Anti-SLAPP motion. 		Anti-SLAPP 1DCA/4 Dec. 19, 2019
Wong v. Wong
Anti-SLAPP motion properly denied because plaintiffs' claims were premised on defendants' alleged breach of obligation to indemnify plaintiffs for liabilities, rather than defendants' prior litigation against plaintiffs. 		Anti-SLAPP 1DCA/1 Dec. 17, 2019
Long Beach Unified School Dist. v. Margaret Williams, LLC
Anti-SLAPP motion properly granted by trial court due to cross-claims arising out of protected activity, and the challenged claims lacking legal sufficiency due to unconscionability of a disputed indemnity provision. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/4 Dec. 11, 2019
Bernstein v. LaBeouf
A defendant's celebrity status does not automatically convert his otherwise private conduct into a matter of public interest protected by the anti-SLAPP statute. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/3 Dec. 9, 2019
Garcia v. Rosenberg
Anti-SLAPP motion was properly granted because plaintiffs failed to comply with the applicable statute of limitations, so their action was time-barred and they would not prevail on the merits. 		Anti-SLAPP 5DCA Dec. 6, 2019
O&C Creditors Group, LLC v. Stephens & Stephens XII, LLC
California's Anti-SLAPP statute protects the dispersal of settlement funds pursuant to active litigation; a lienhold challenger must demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits to overcome an Anti-SLAPP motion 		Anti-SLAPP 1DCA/4 Nov. 27, 2019
Briganti v. Chow
Defamation claim should not be stricken because although defendant contended that his Facebook comment was hyperbole, plaintiff need only establish her claim had at least minimal merit under anti-SLAPP analysis. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/4 Nov. 26, 2019
Lee v. Kim
Appellant failed to demonstrate a probability of prevailing on his claim; thus, trial court properly granted anti-SLAPP motion. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/1 Nov. 4, 2019
Miller Marital Deduction Trust v. Zurich American Insurance Co.
Trial court properly denied defendant's anti-SLAPP motion, because anti-SLAPP statute does not apply to cause of action for breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. 		Anti-SLAPP 1DCA/3 Oct. 23, 2019
Starview Property, LLC. v. Lee
An anti-SLAPP motion may be brought within 60 days of an amended complaint if the amended complaint pleads new causes of action that could not have been raised earlier. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/8 Oct. 21, 2019
Supershuttle International Inc. v. Labor & Workforce Development Agency
Defendants' anti-SLAPP motion failed because plaintiff's allegations did not arise from protected activity, but rather from the Labor Commissioner's intended act of refusing to recognize a superior court judgment. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/8 Oct. 9, 2019
Abir Cohen Treyzon Salo, LLP v. Lahiji
Reviews posted on an Internet website meet the definition of 'protected activity' under anti-SLAPP law, even if the reviewer denies that she made the review. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/2 Oct. 7, 2019
Olivares v. Pineda
Plaintiffs' Civil Code Section 1950.5(b)(1) claim for misuse of a security deposit did not arise from protected activity, and plaintiffs established a probability of success on their remaining claims arising from protected activity. 		Anti-SLAPP 1DCA/3 Sep. 27, 2019
Jeffra v. Cal. State Lottery
Although his claims arose from protected activity, plaintiff provided sufficient evidence that his claim for retaliation under the California Whistleblower Protection Act had at least minimal merit, defeating defendant's anti-SLAPP motion. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/8 Sep. 3, 2019
Benton v. Benton
Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.17(e) provides that denial of a special motion to strike an anti-SLAPP complaint because the action is exempt under that section, may not be appealed. 		Anti-SLAPP 4DCA/2 Aug. 29, 2019
Dickinson v. Cosby
Plaintiff presented sufficient evidence defendant approved or ratified allegedly defamatory statements, the statements were actionable assertions of fact, and were of and concerning her, defeating defendant's anti-SLAPP motion to strike. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/8 Jul. 30, 2019
Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.
Anti-SLAPP statute contains no exception for discrimination or retaliation claims; thus, journalist's termination for alleged plagiarism constituted 'conduct in furtherance of' employer's 'speech in connection with' public matter. 		Anti-SLAPP CASC Jul. 23, 2019
Monster Energy Company v. Schechter
Factfinder could reasonably conclude attorney agreed to be bound by extensive confidentiality provisions referring to parties and their counsel in settlement agreement by signing under notation 'APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT.' 		Anti-SLAPP CASC Jul. 12, 2019
ValueRock TN Prop. v. PK II Larwin Square
Anti-SLAPP 'arose from' from inquiry requires defendant to show 'speech or petitioning activity itself is the wrong complained of.' 		Anti-SLAPP 4DCA/3 Jul. 1, 2019
Jenni Rivera Enterprises v. Latin World Entertainment
Plaintiff made a prima facie showing sufficient to support favorable judgment on its claims against Producer defendants, but First Amendment barred plaintiff's claims against broadcaster. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/7 Jun. 28, 2019
Swanson v. County of Riverside
In order to succeed on an anti-SLAPP motion, the action must primarily arise from protected speech or petitioning activity; thus, anti-SLAPP motion did not apply. 		Anti-SLAPP 4DCA/1 Jun. 19, 2019
Marriage of Benner
Plaintiff's petition to join court-appointed expert and provide notice of the trial court's intent to determine reasonableness of the expert's fees did not state cause of action against the expert. 		Anti-SLAPP 4DCA/1 Jun. 14, 2019
Cuevas-Martinez v. Sun Salt Sand, Inc.
Trial court erred in granting respondents' anti-SLAPP motion to malicious prosecution complaint because respondents lacked probable cause to prosecute two claims in their prior lawsuit. 		Anti-SLAPP 4DCA/2 Jun. 10, 2019
Rudisill v. Cal. Coastal Commission
Real parties in interest could have reasonably concluded that petitioner asserted claims against them arising from conduct protected under the anti-SLAPP statute, so attorneys' fees sanctions against real parties were unwarranted. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/2 Jun. 7, 2019
Modification: Key v. Tyler
Anti-SLAPP statute applies to petition seeking enforcement of no contest clause, and movant's presentation of an underlying ruling provided sufficient evidence demonstrating probability of success on movant's No Contest Petition. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/2 May 9, 2019
FilmOn.com Inc. v. DoubleVerify Inc.
Statements that concerned a matter of public interest, but were only issued privately to paying clients and did not contribute to any public debate, did not qualify for anti-SLAPP protection. 		Anti-SLAPP CASC May 7, 2019
Key v. Tyler
Anti-SLAPP statute applies to petition seeking enforcement of no contest clause, and movant's presentation of an underlying ruling provided sufficient evidence demonstrating probability of success on movant's No Contest Petition. 		Anti-SLAPP 2DCA/2 Apr. 23, 2019
Sonoma Media Investments, LLC v. Superior Court
Anti-SLAPP motion should have been granted as to all causes of action because plaintiffs failed to make a prima facie showing of falsity. 		Anti-SLAPP 1DCA/5 Apr. 10, 2019
Modification: Sonoma Media Investments, LLC v. Superior Court
Modification 		Anti-SLAPP 1DCA/5 Apr. 10, 2019
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.