Ruling by
Carin T. FujisakiLower Court
Contra Costa County Superior CourtLower Court Judge
Charles S. TreatPlaintiffs' Civil Code Section 1950.5(b)(1) claim for misuse of a security deposit did not arise from protected activity, and plaintiffs established a probability of success on their remaining claims arising from protected activity.
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Law Practice, Ethics/Professional Responsibility, Civil Litigation
Should we revisit the ‘prior win’ standard for malicious prosecution?
Aug. 7, 2020
By Louie H. Castoria
By Louie H. Castoria
