The conversation ranges from AB 2355, the surviving bill from a package of three targeting deepfakes and AI-generated campaign ads, to how the commission is exploring technology to flag potential campaign money laundering and warn public officials of conflicts before they happen. Along the way, Silver explains why the agency's priority is transparency before an election rather than penalties after it, and why the appearance of impropriety can damage public trust as much as the real thing.
The conversation ranges from AB 2355, the surviving bill from a package of three targeting deepfakes and AI-generated campaign ads, to how the commission is exploring technology to flag potential campaign money laundering and warn public officials of conflicts before they happen. Along the way, Silver explains why the agency's priority is transparency before an election rather than penalties after it, and why the appearance of impropriety can damage public trust as much as the real thing.
Highlights:
• The FPPC's post-Watergate origins and its role as the state's campaign finance and ethics watchdog
• AB 2355 and enforcing disclaimer rules for AI-generated or AI-modified campaign ads
• Using AI to flag patterns of possible campaign money laundering
• A tool to warn officials of potential conflicts between their financial disclosures and upcoming agenda items
• Why transparency before the election takes priority
• The legislation Silver's office sponsored to ban campaign contributions inside state buildings
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
Jeremy_Ellis@dailyjournal.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 213-229-5424
Send a letter to the editor:
Email: letters@dailyjournal.com



