This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Oct. 29, 2026

Jury rejects racial harassment claim despite plaintiff's landmark Supreme Court victory

A San Francisco jury rejected Twanda Bailey's harassment and retaliation claims after a California Supreme Court ruling revived her lawsuit and clarified when a single racial slur constitutes actionable harassment.

A San Francisco jury rejected a former District Attorney's Office employee's racial harassment and retaliation claims, ending a trial made possible by a California Supreme Court decision that clarified when a single racial slur can constitute unlawful workplace harassment.

Twanda Bailey, who sued the city in 2015 after alleging that a coworker called her the n-word, had lost on summary judgment in Superior Court and again in the 1st District Court of Appeal. But the state ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up