This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Procedure

Oct. 20, 2026

Judges, lawyers debate tougher sanctions to curb discovery abuses

An informal coalition organized by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lawrence P. Riff is exploring ways to improve discovery practices, but judges and attorneys disagree over whether sanctions or greater cooperation offer the best solution.

Judges, lawyers debate tougher sanctions to curb discovery abuses
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lawrence P. Riff

What would happen if judges sanctioned attorneys $150 every time they included a general objection in a discovery response?

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lawrence P. Riff, who oversees the court's civil branch, suspects the practice would disappear.

"What if we were to start sanctioning counsel, say, $150, every time there's a general objection in a response?" Riff asked during a virtual Los Angeles County Bar Association program Monday evening...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up