This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Immigration

Oct. 12, 2026

'Remain in Mexico' ruling raises new questions over courts' reach

A federal judge invalidated the original Migrant Protection Protocols, finding violations of federal law and constitutional protections. Legal scholars say the ruling could face appellate challenges over organizational standing and the rights of asylum seekers outside the United States.

A federal judge's decision to invalidate the Trump administration's original "Remain in Mexico" policy has renewed debate over the limits of judicial oversight of immigration enforcement, the standing of legal aid organizations and the constitutional rights of asylum seekers forced to wait outside the United States.

U.S. District Judge Jesus G. Bernal granted partial summary judgment Wednesday to immigrant advocacy organizations and asylum seekers challenging the ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up