This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Business Law

Aug. 19, 2026

For fine art transactions, it's best to read the fine print

California art transactions sit within ordinary commercial law, but art-specific statutes can displace familiar assumptions about freedom of contract, remedies and risk allocation--making a generic commercial-sales form an imperfect fit.

Jeff Miles

Shareholder
Carlton Fields, LLP

See more...

For fine art transactions, it's best to read the fine print
Shutterstock

California art transactions sit at the intersection of ordinary commercial law and a specialized statutory framework bespoke for the art market. A painting, drawing, print, sculpture or mixed media work generally qualifies as a "good," so an outright sale ordinarily falls within Division 2 of the California Commercial Code, California's enactment of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code.

But California also has art-specific statutes that can displace ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up