Constitutional Law
Aug. 18, 2026
Is an algorithmic feed 'speech'? Courts are about to decide
As courts grapple with whether algorithmically generated feeds are "expressive," the answer may determine the extent of social media platforms' First Amendment rights in the age of AI.
Krista L. Baughman
Partner
Baughman Law
1255 Treat Blvd., Suite 300
Walnut Creek , CA
Phone: (925) 310-6033
Email: krista@baughmanlaw.com
Brooklyn Law School; Brooklyn NY
Krista's practice focuses on First Amendment and anti-SLAPP law and litigation.
What qualifies as "speech" in the age of AI and social media? Are algorithmically generated feeds deserving of First Amendment protection?
These are the tough questions at the heart of Meta Platforms, Inc. v. Bonta, a case challenging California's "Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act" (SB 976), in which Meta, TikTok and Google seek to prohibit Attorney General Rob Bonta from enforcing sections of the act which would bar them from ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In