A federal judge ruled that LinkedIn's alleged collection of sensitive medical data to sell targeted ads meets the "highly offensive" standard for a privacy tort class action to move forward, although he dismissed a separate California Invasion of Privacy Act lawsuit over nearly identical allegations.
U.S. District Judge Edward J. Davila issued a 20-page order Thursday on motions to dismiss in a pair of class actions against the platform over its "Insight Tag&quo...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



