This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Jul. 31, 2026

Not every search is the same

The Supreme Court's decisions in Case v. Montana and Chatrie v. United States establish a modern Fourth Amendment framework that distinguishes law enforcement's emergency public safety functions from its investigative powers while expanding constitutional protections for digital location data.

Michael McCarthy

Kendall Brill & Kelly LLP

See more...

Not every search is the same
Shutterstock

The current Supreme Court term has been a defining one for the Fourth Amendment. In Case v. Montana and the recently announced Chatrie v. United States, the Court alternatively relaxed the basis for a warrantless entry into the home, traditionally the height of Fourth Amendment protection, and required Fourth Amendment probable cause and particularity scrutiny of a geofence warrant. Although they seemingly pull in different directions--less protections for the c...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up