Class Action
Jul. 15, 2026
Consumers sue Driscoll's over alleged 'forever chemicals' in berries
A proposed class action filed in Santa Cruz County alleges Driscoll's Inc. falsely marketed its conventional strawberries as safe, premium products while failing to disclose the presence of PFAS-related compounds and engaging in "greenwashing" through sustainability claims.
Driscoll's Inc., the world's largest berry producer, is facing a proposed consumer class action alleging it misled Californians by marketing its conventional strawberries as premium, rigorously tested products while failing to disclose the presence of PFAS-related compounds.
Plaintiff Christina Washington filed suit in Santa Cruz County Superior Court on behalf of California consumers, asserting claims under the Unfair Competition Law, False Advertising Law, Environmental ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In