This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Securities

Jul. 13, 2026

Supreme Court bars implied private right of action under Investment Company Act

The ruling delivers a significant victory for the registered investment industry, sharply limiting the ability of activist shareholders to challenge anti-takeover voting measures.

Joshua D.N. Hess

Partner
Sheppard

See more...

Supreme Court bars implied private right of action under Investment Company Act
Shutterstock

In a significant win for the registered investment industry, the United States Supreme Court held that the principal law that governs mutual funds and other investment companies does not permit activist shareholders to sue to void anti-takeover voting measures. In FS Credit Opportunities Corp. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd., the Supreme Court held in a 6-3 decision that Section 47(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (ICA) did not create an implied private right...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up