Torts/Personal Injury
Jun. 18, 2026
Supreme Court glyphosate fight is supposed to redefine failure-to-warn lawsuits, but will it?
Monsanto v. Durnell asks whether federal pesticide labeling law preempts state failure-to-warn claims, a question emerging from decades of Roundup litigation that could significantly reshape corporate liability and toxic-exposure lawsuits nationwide.
R. Brent Wisner
Lead Trial Attorney and Managing Partner
Wisner Baum
Phone: (310) 207-3233
Email: RBWisner@wisnerbaum.com
Georgetown Univ Law Ctr; Washington DC
As protesters gathered outside the U.S. Supreme Court for the "People v. Poison" rally earlier this year, inside the courtroom, the justices considered a case that could reshape the future of corporate liability, pesticide regulation and tens of thousands of toxic-exposure lawsuits nationwide.
At issue in
Or access this article for $45
Already a subscriber?
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up