This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Jun. 15, 2026

Reed v. Town of Gilbert: Sign regulation 10 years later

Two landmark Supreme Court decisions have reshaped how cities regulate signs, giving local governments a roadmap for crafting billboard and signage rules that survive First Amendment challenges.

Marco A. Martinez

Partner
Best Best & Krieger LLP

Municipal Law practice group

See more...

<i>Reed v. Town of Gilbert</i>: Sign regulation 10 years later
Shutterstock

More than a decade after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Reed v. Town of Gilbert, cities are still navigating how to regulate signs--particularly billboards and off-premises advertising--without violating the First Amendment. While a later decision, City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising, restored some flexibility, sign regulation remains a legally sensitive area that requires careful drafting and regular review.

A turnin...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up