Family
May 27, 2026
Good parents, bad moment, wrong outcome? The problem with overbroad dependency cases
In re Gilberto G. makes clear that a single lapse in parental judgment cannot, on its own, sustain a dependency petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, offering critical guidance for practitioners navigating the intersection of parental rights and child safety.
The California Court of Appeal's recent decision in In re Gilberto G. serves as a critical reminder that dependency jurisdiction requires more than evidence of a single lapse in judgment. In re Gilberto G., 325 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 (Ct. App. 2024). The case underscores the evidentiary burden necessary to sustain a Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 petition and provides important guidance for practitioners navigating the intersection of parental rights and chi...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In