This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Ethics/Professional Responsibility

May 19, 2026

Kirkland accused of conflict after pre-suit talks with prospective plaintiff

Software company Adaptamed seeks to disqualify Kirkland & Ellis from representing Commure, alleging the firm obtained confidential information during a pre-suit consultation before later appearing for the defendant.

Kirkland accused of conflict after pre-suit talks with prospective plaintiff
Rick Richmond of Larson LLP

Defense attorneys at Kirkland & Ellis LLP are accused of violating California ethics rules by consulting with a prospective plaintiff about a planned trade secrets suit before later representing the defendant company in the same case.

In emails attached to a motion to disqualify, Kirkland & Ellis denied any ethical violation and contends its lawyers warned the plaintiff company not to disclose confidential information, promptly ran conflicts checks after learning Commute...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up