This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Apr. 28, 2026

Remand clears path for public nuisance claims against food giants

A federal judge remanded San Francisco's lawsuit against major food manufacturers to state court, finding the state is the real party in interest and clearing the way for public nuisance and unfair competition claims over ultra-processed food marketing.

A federal judge Thursday remanded San Francisco's lawsuit against nine major food manufacturers to state court, returning the ultra-processed foods case to its original forum and allowing public nuisance and unfair competition claims to proceed.

U.S. District Judge Jon S. Tigar ruled from the bench after a venue hearing, sending the case to San Francisco Superior Court. Defendants removed the action to the Northern District of California in January, about a month after San Fra...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up