This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Apr. 17, 2026

The price of privacy in California's data economy

The California Supreme Court's grant of review in Yeh v. Twitter gives the justices a chance to reinvigorate the state constitution's explicit right to privacy -- a 1972 protection inspired by Justice William O. Douglas -- by deciding whether companies' monetization of users' personal contact information can support a consumer protection claim.

Three prominent liberal lawyers were in San Francisco on June 14, 1968. Thanks to them, the right to privacy is a premier feature of the California Constitution.

Their influence on the entitlement of individuals to personal autonomy is directly on point in a new grant of review by the California Supreme Court as the justices consider how the right to privacy affects businesses' monetization of personal information in the data age.

Over the decades, the high court has ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up