A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge used a concurring opinion Wednesday to spotlight what he described as a troubling dynamic in immigration proceedings: the potential for meritless appeals to be encouraged as a way to delay removal.
In Santana-Gonzalez v. Bondi, No. 16-70793, a three-judge panel denied a petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision, leaving in place an order of removal. But Judge Lawrence J. VanDyke, author of the unanimous opinio...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



