SANTA ANA -- Counsel for Apple Inc. argued in federal court on Monday that a $634 million jury verdict finding the tech giant liable for patent infringement should be overturned because the jury wasn't properly instructed on the definition of a "patient monitor" as it relates to the Apple Watch's heart monitoring features.
The arguments came after U.S. District Judge James V. Selna tentatively denied Apple's motion for judgment as a matter of law or a new tri...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



