In April 2018, Section 230 was on the docket and oral argument was at hand. The justices of the California Supreme Court faced a vexed and thorny issue: could judicial takedown orders regarding defamatory content override the Communication Decency Act's immunity provisions?
The question, targeting Yelp in the case of Hassell v. Bird, had been brewing for years.
The high court would eventually vote 4-3 to affirm and strengthen Section 230, but only after a m...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In



