This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Jan. 30, 2026

California retools jury selection law to confront Batson/Wheeler legacy failures

A new California law meant to fix decades of racially biased jury selection is drawing pushback from lawyers who say it's unworkable -- while old convictions tainted by the system it replaced are being reopened.

In the 1970s, the California Supreme Court led by Chief Justice Rose E. Bird tried to curb racist jury stacking through what became known as the Batson/Wheeler process.

It was an effort that largely failed, casting a long shadow that today haunts a fresh effort by state lawmakers to ensure that fair juries decide cases. As with Batson/Wheeler, there have been protests by lawyers and law enforcement groups and an uneasy look back at flawed convictions.

The new law's re...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up