This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Feb. 6, 2026

Silicon Valley's next play on Section 230

Section 230 turns 30 with bipartisan enemies in Congress, courts steadily chipping away at its protections, and the Silicon Valley giants it made possible refusing to come to its defense.

Debates about the future of Section 230 include powerful but unusually quiet players: the Silicon Valley technology companies that gained the most in the years after its passage.

Alphabet Inc., the parent company of Google and YouTube, and Meta Platforms Inc., the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, did not exist at the time the law was signed. Both thrived under the statutory regime but declined this week to comment on the 30th anniversary of the statute and its future.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up