This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Feb. 20, 2026

Plaintiff: Law says Netflix had to stop operations when suit was filed

A federal judge challenged DivX's theory that Netflix induced patent infringement by continuing operations after being sued, as attorneys sparred over alleged copying and the scope of streaming technology claims.

By continuing operations after it was sued, Netflix is accused of inducing its users to infringe DivX patents, the plaintiff's lawyers argued in a federal patent lawsuit Thursday.

The argument came during a hearing on various pretrial motions before U.S. District Judge George H. Wu ahead of a trial set to begin in March in Los Angeles.

Appearing on behalf of DivX, Stephen M. Payne of Irell & Manella LLP in Newport Beach argued that Netflix's continued use of t...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up