9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Aug. 11, 2025
9th Circuit upholds $243M judgment against disbarred attorney in student loan fraud case
A federal appeals court has affirmed a $243 million order against former California lawyer James Wen, rejecting his Eighth Amendment challenge and upholding restitution and civil penalties for his role in a nationwide student loan debt relief scheme that defrauded thousands of borrowers.




A 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel has affirmed a $243 million order against a disbarred California attorney awarding restitution and civil penalties to the government for his role with several companies found liable for a student loan fraud.
The per curiam panel on Thursday affirmed a ruling by U.S. District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald of Los Angeles in favor of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Los Angeles city attorney's office, and two other states.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In