Civil Procedure,
Civil Litigation
Mar. 19, 2024
In a fees-as-damages case, a Rule 26 stipulation can protect draft reports and communications
Civil litigators in California Superior Court should consider stipulating to apply Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for expert discovery, as it can make the trial expert’s role more efficient and avoid discovery disputes.
Ken Moscaret
Ken Moscaret, a former business litigator with trial experience, is a 33-year expert on attorney fee reasonableness and litigation management in high-stakes fee cases.
In this column, I suggest a useful practice tip for civil litigators to consider in California Superior Court actions when retaining experts to testify at trial. As a longtime attorney fee expert who has opined dozens of times on fee reasonableness and litigation management for both fee claimants and fee opponents in large, complex, multimillion-dollar fee dispute cases, I have found that this practice tip can make a trial expert’s role more efficient.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In