This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government

Apr. 11, 2022

Bill aims to bar civil courts from recognizing other states’ anti-abortion laws

AB 1666 would prohibit the application of an out-of-state abortion law, as well as any “civil judgment received through an adjudication” of such a law. The bill would challenge “full faith and credit” clause.

To what extent are state courts required to respect other states’ laws? California might be about to find out.

A bill advancing through the Legislature would bar the use of California’s civil courts to enforce provisions of other states’ anti-abortion laws. What’s at stake with AB 1666 isn’t just abortion but the U.S. Constitution’s “full faith and credit” clause. Opponents have already said they will sue if it becomes law.

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up