This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice,
Family

Jul. 27, 2021

Private judges must disclose relationships with counsel

In Jolie v. Superior Court, the 2nd District Court of Appeal mandated strict and literal compliance with the disclosure obligations of private judges. The court’s opinion has significant implications for attorneys with multiple cases pending before the same private judge.

Franklin R. Garfield

Garfield & Tepper

Email: frank@frankgarfield.com

See more...

In Jolie v. Superior Court, 2021 DJDAR 7512 (July 23, 2021), the 2nd District Court of Appeal mandated strict and literal compliance with the disclosure obligations of private judges. The court's opinion has significant implications for attorneys with multiple cases pending before the same private judge.

Priv...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up