Constitutional Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Oct. 22, 2020
‘Finality’ may be the next key issue in takings litigation
Just what makes a decision “final” enough to support a Fifth Amendment takings claim?
Just what makes a decision "final" enough to support a Fifth Amendment takings claim?
If the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' latest decision is any indication, determining the "finality" of a local agency's decision may well be the next key issue in takings litigation. After denying en banc review of a property owner's taking claim in
Or access this article for $45
Already a subscriber?
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Constitutional Law
Pakdel v. City and County of San Francisco
District court properly dismissed plaintiffs' takings claim as unripe because plaintiffs did not satisfy finality requirement.
Constitutional Law
Knick v. Township of Scott
State-litigation requirement under 'Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City' imposes an unjustifiable burden on takings plaintiffs, conflicts with the ...
