Criminal
Oct. 1, 2020
Defense attorneys back bondsmen for overturn of law to end cash bail
The attorneys say the state should instead rely on a 2018 1st District Court of Appeal ruling that held judges must consider a defendant’s ability to pay when setting bail.
Defense attorneys have given the bail bonds industry some added leverage behind its effort to defeat Proposition 25 on the November ballot and keep California's cash bail system in place.
But not because they want to protect the livelihoods of those who provide bail services. The attorneys say the state should instead rely on a 2018 1st District Court of Appeal ruling<...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Government, Criminal
Money bail foe says he isn’t done trying to destroy bond industry
By Malcolm Maclachlan
Criminal Law and Procedure
In re Humphrey
Court must consider financial circumstances of defendant, and potentially effective alternatives to money bail, before setting bail amount.
