Civil Litigation,
Antitrust & Trade Reg.
Aug. 21, 2020
The line between anticompetitive behavior and hypercompetitive behavior
Last week, the 9th Circuit handed a big victory to Qualcomm, Inc., reversing the district court’s judgment that Qualcomm unreasonably restrained trade in, and unlawfully monopolized, certain modem chip markets, in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act.
Jason D. Russell
Partner
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Litigation
300 S Grand Ave, Suite 3400
Los Angeles , CA 90071
Phone: (213) 687-5000
Email: jason.russell@skadden.com
Columbia Univ Law School
On Aug. 11, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals handed a big victory to Qualcomm, Inc., reversing the district court's judgment that Qualcomm unreasonably restrained trade in, and unlawfully monopolized, certain modem chip markets, in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. In reversing the judgment, the 9th Circuit also vacated the lower court's permanent, nationwide injunction prohibiting several of Qualcomm's core business practices.
Or access this article for $45
Already a subscriber?
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up