Arguments on Justice Johnson accusations set for March 18

Oral arguments regarding allegations against Justice Jeffrey W. Johnson of prejudicial judicial conduct and improper behavior are set for March 18 in San Francisco, the Commission on Judicial Performance announced Wednesday.

Justice Jeffrey W. Johnson with his attorneys Reginald A. Vitek, left, and Paul S. Meyer, right, during the Commission on Judicial Performance inquiry hearings.

The announcement follows a Monday report from a pane...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?
Sign In

Filter by date

Exact Phrase

Not the words

At least one of the words

All the words

City of LA asks 9th Circuit to remove judge from homeless case

Lyft sexual assault cases consolidated as Uber hit with $8.5M verdict

Losing a big case: How to recover, regroup and recharge

Judges and Judiciary,

Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Jan. 9, 2020

Arguments on Justice Johnson accusations set for March 18

Enewsletter Sign-up

Related Content

Judges and Judiciary

Justice Jeffrey Johnson, Commission on Judicial Performance trade opening argument briefs

Judges and Judiciary

New harassment suit filed against justice, 2nd District Court of Appeal

Jeffrey W. Johnson

Judges and Judiciary

Special masters report on Justice Johnson leaves areas to continue fight, says attorney

Judges and Judiciary, Government, Ethics/Professional Responsibility

Court OKs CHP officer’s suit involving 2nd District justice

Judges and Judiciary, Ethics/Professional Responsibility

New ethics rules warning: Attorneys need to watch what they say in court filings

Judges and Judiciary

Justice's lawyers say women lied; commission lawyers ask why