Labor/Employment,
California Supreme Court
Dec. 5, 2019
State Supreme Court hears argument in Apple Store employee bag check case
Plaintiffs say they should be compensated for time spent undergoing the retailer’s anti-theft security checks before and after shifts.
A lawyer representing a class of more than 12,000 Apple Store employees urged the state Supreme Court to consider the time they spend undergoing bag checks compensable under state wage order law during oral arguments Wednesday.
Kimberly A. Kralowec of Kralowec Law PC in San Francisco said the time was compensable under Wage Order 7 of the Industrial Welfare Commission, which defines "hours worked" as "the time during which an emplo...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Labor Law
Troester v. Starbucks Corporation
In answering a question posed by the 9th Circuit this Court held that the relevant California statutes and wage orders have not incorporated the "de minimis" doctrine found in the Fair La...
Employment Law
Rodriguez v. Nike Retail Services
District court erred granting summary judgment for defendant because, under 'Troester v. Starbucks Corp.', the federal de minimis doctrine does not apply to California wage and hour statu...
Employment Law
Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.
Employees required to travel to work site on employer's buses must be paid for travel time.
