Immigration,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Oct. 3, 2019
US judge criticizes attorneys’ national injunction request
The federal judge considering whether to temporarily block the Trump administration's so-called public charge rule, which seeks to stop immigrants from using public benefits if they are not permanent residents, indicated Tuesday she is unlikely to halt the policy nationwide, refusing to impose "relief broader than necessary."
OAKLAND -- The federal judge considering whether to temporarily block the Trump administration's so-called public charge rule, which seeks to stop immigrants from using public benefits if they are not permanent residents, indicated Tuesday she is unlikely to halt the policy nationwide, refusing to impose "relief broader than necessary."
With an eye toward potential appellate reversal, U.S. District Judge
Or access this article for $45
Already a subscriber?
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Nationwide injunction from elsewhere needn’t moot matter before 9th Circuit, panel holds
By Brian Cardile
Immigration, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Judges air skepticism of nationwide injunctions in immigration-related arguments
By Brian Cardile
