Civil Litigation,
California Supreme Court
Sep. 24, 2019
Sanchez revisited: A better way to handle objections
The California Supreme Court wreaked havoc on the trial courts when it issued its decision in People v. Sanchez, 63 Cal. 4th 665 (2016), and changed the rules for admissibility of expert testimony.
Timothy D. Reuben
Reuben MediationTim Reuben spent more than 40 years handling complex legal disputes in California's state and federal courts. As the founder and managing partner of Reuben Raucher & Blum in Los Angeles, he has worked on a wide range of matters through jury and bench trials, arbitration, mediation, judicial reference, and settlement conferences across multiple areas of civil law, including commercial, real estate, construction, employment, intellectual property, insurance, professional liability, and unfair competition.
The California Supreme Court wreaked havoc on the trial courts when it issued its decision in People v. Sanchez, 63 Cal. 4th 665 (2016), and changed the rules for admissibility of expert testimony. The court held that "the case-specific statements related by the prosecution expert concerning defendant's gang membership constituted inadmissible hearsay under California la...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In