Civil Litigation,
California Supreme Court
Sep. 24, 2019
Sanchez revisited: A better way to handle objections
The California Supreme Court wreaked havoc on the trial courts when it issued its decision in People v. Sanchez, 63 Cal. 4th 665 (2016), and changed the rules for admissibility of expert testimony.
Timothy D. Reuben
Founder and President of Reuben Raucher & Blum and the Founder of Reuben Mediation
Email: treuben@rrbattorneys.com
Timothy D. Reuben is a mediator, litigator and author who focuses on resolving complex civil disputes in state and federal courts, as well as in arbitration and mediation. He is also the author of "Tequila, a Story of Success, Love & Violence," a legal novel inspired by real world legal practice that explores power, loyalty and the human dynamics that drive conflict.
The California Supreme Court wreaked havoc on the trial courts when it issued its decision in People v. Sanchez, 63 Cal. 4th 665 (2016), and changed the rules for admissibility of expert testimony. The court held that "the case-specific statements related by the prosecution expert concerning defendant's gang membership constituted inadmissible hearsay under California la...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In