This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

U.S. Supreme Court,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Aug. 22, 2019

National injunction standard remains unclear after ruling

The standard for what makes a case “extraordinary” enough to justify such an injunction is not clear, legal experts say.

National injunction standard remains unclear after ruling
President Donald Trump / New York Times News Service

Last week, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals cautioned its district judges against too liberally granting nationwide injunctive relief to plaintiffs challenging Trump administration policies and to reserve the broad, increasingly controversial remedy for only "exceptional cases."

That guidance, given in a split motions panel ruling that limited to the circuit's borders the reach of U.S. District Judge $95

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up