Civil Litigation,
Health Care & Hospital Law
Aug. 13, 2019
Plaintiff’s attorneys appeal overturned $417M talc verdict
Attorneys representing the plaintiff in an overturned $417 million talc verdict filed a petition with the state Supreme Court Monday, arguing the appellate court misread case law over Johnson & Johnson’s duty to warn.
Attorneys representing the plaintiff in an overturned $417 million talc verdict filed a petition with the state Supreme Court Monday, arguing the Court of Appeal misread case law over Johnson & Johnson's duty to warn.
The bellwether case went from a $417 million jury verdict to being overturned by the judge on the grounds of insufficient science. This summer the 2nd District Court of Appeal mostly sided with Johnson & John...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation
Orrick beats $25M plaintiff’s suit over Johnson & Johnson talc
By Justin Kloczko
Civil Litigation, Health Care & Hospital Law
Johnson & Johnson wins LA baby powder case
By Blaise Scemama
Torts
T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Notwithstanding drugmaker no longer made or sold brand-name drug when it allegedly harmed plaintiff who took drug's generic version, foreseeability and other 'Rowland' factors provide bas...
Civil Litigation
Retired teacher who won $12M in talc lawsuit dies, canceling punitive damages phase
By Gina Kim
Civil Litigation
J&J urges appeals court not to reinstate $417M talc verdict
By Gina Kim
Civil Litigation
Retired school teacher wins $12M in talc-mesothelioma case against Johnson & Johnson, Colgate
By Gina Kim