Judges and Judiciary,
Criminal
Aug. 1, 2019
PG&E responds to judge’s query about investigative report
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. said it “strongly disagrees” with a newspaper investigation suggesting that it prioritized lobbying efforts and investor returns ahead of maintenance on equipment it knew posed a wildfire risk.
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. said it "strongly disagrees" with a newspaper investigation suggesting it prioritized lobbying efforts and investor returns ahead of maintenance on equipment it knew posed a wildfire risk.
Lawyers for the utility characterized accusations made in the article as an "oversimplification and misrepresentation" of complex issues.
"Critically, the WSJ Article fails to ment...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Civil Litigation, Government
Wildfire funding suit shouldn’t be linked to PG&E probation, state argues
By Gina Kim
Civil Litigation, Bankruptcy
Lawyers for fire victims accuse PG&E of seeking advantage
By Winston Cho
Judges and Judiciary, Criminal, Bankruptcy
Judge who has blasted PG&E is possible candidate to help oversee bankruptcy
By Winston Cho
