Letters,
Education Law,
9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
Jun. 20, 2019
Universities cannot shortcut the due process rights of those accused of sexual misconduct
In the June 12 edition of the Daily Journal, David Urban wrote an article regarding Austin v. University of Oregon, 2019 DJDAR 4815 (9th Cir. June 4, 2019), arguing that the case’s “reasoning will be relevant in California because it expressly interprets federal standards for due process in the student discipline context.”
Timothy D. Reuben
Reuben MediationTim Reuben spent more than 40 years handling complex legal disputes in California's state and federal courts. As the founder and managing partner of Reuben Raucher & Blum in Los Angeles, he has worked on a wide range of matters through jury and bench trials, arbitration, mediation, judicial reference, and settlement conferences across multiple areas of civil law, including commercial, real estate, construction, employment, intellectual property, insurance, professional liability, and unfair competition.
In the June 12 edition of the Daily Journal, David Urban wrote an article regarding Austin v. University of Oregon, 2019 DJDAR 4815 (9th Cir. June 4, 2019), arguing that the case's "reasoning will be relevant in California because it expressly i...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In