Labor/Employment,
California Supreme Court
Apr. 26, 2019
State high court gives lawsuit against Giants a fresh at-bat
A lawsuit against the San Francisco Giants brought by guards at the team’s park will return to the plate in state court with the California Supreme Court’s ruling that the alleged labor violations do not require interpretation of the plaintiffs’ union agreement, and are thus not subject to its arbitration clause.
A lawsuit against the San Francisco Giants brought by guards at the team's park will return to the plate in state court with the California Supreme Court's ruling that the alleged labor violations do not require interpretation of the plaintiffs' union agreement and are thus not subject to its arbitration clause.
The guards sued under the state labor code, arguing they are intermittent workers who are discharged after every Giants ho...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
Related Content
Labor Law
Melendez v. S.F. Baseball Associates LLC
Where dispute concerns meaning of state labor statute and requires, at most, court to 'look at' collective bargaining agreement, suit not preempted by Labor Management Relations Act.
